Check it out, this one isn't even for a programmer! It is for an Assistant Marketing Manager. This is on top of our standard jobs that we just keep descriptions up for.

So ... if Logos sounds cool but you're not a programmer type ... well, this one may be for you!

Also: I know blogging has been light lately. Hopefully I'll get a serious post or two up in the next few days (I've been working through Didache 4 ... )

Just a quick note that Tertullian.org now hosts a version of Eusebius' Onomasticon. Whether this is new or not, I can't tell you. But check it out if you're interested.

I've been blogging about the Didache (off and on) for the past month or so. So imagine my surprise when I saw that Christianity Today has an article on the Didache titled "What the Teaching Can Teach Us". "Teaching" is, of course, the translation of Didache.

So if you're searching around for info on the Didache or just want to see what it says. I'm working through the text, making my own provisional translation, and writing a series of notes reflective of my thoughts as I work through the text. See ricoblog's Didache category for more info and all relevant posts.

(h/t: Michael Bird's blog Euangelion for the link to CT)

If you're were a boy in the USA in the 1970's, chances are you owned an Evel Knievel Stunt Cycle set.

If you were really cool (like my brother) you had the Super Jet Cycle. You could put flint in the rocket tubes, and sparks would shoot out when the bike was running! These were real sparks. No fake lights and AA battery. This was the 1970's, before the era of the lawsuit, when folks took responsibility for their actions (and stupidity), they didn't try to pawn it off on someone else.

I had the Stunt Chopper set. It was SO COOL! Wish I still had it, but I don't think I do. We used to make ramps and see how far we could jump 'em.

They don't make toys like that anymore. Too bad. And if you're not familiar at all with any of this ... well, check this out.

Anyway, catch up with Evel. Seems like he's paying the price for what he put his body through. I can still see the slo-mo highlights of his Ceasar's Palace jump ... ouch!

My favorite book cataloguing site and my favorite used book site form a partnership. Check out the press release from Abebooks.

Let's just hope there isn't an 'AbeThing' in the offing. But all in all, it sounds awesome. Congrats, Tim!

Related News: Check out LibraryThing's new Thing-ology blog if you're at all into book cataloguing or social aspects of networks.

I think one of my favorite writings in the corpus known as the Apostolic Fathers is the one generally known as "Second Clement".

On Friday, I went to grab lunch from a teriyaki place just up the street from Logos. I ordered my beef yakisoba to go. While waiting for the order, I read through the first chapter of Second Clement. I was reading the Loeb edition from Lake, as it was handy on my shelf at the office. And I read it in the Greek, using the English on the facing page to help out in the places I got stuck.

Second Clement is awesome. You really should read it. If you read Hebrews in the NT and respond with a general "whoa!", then you need to read Second Clement. It is an awesome example of an early Christian homily.

There are two clauses in particular that hit me in this reading. The first was in 2Cl 1.6: "Our entire life was nothing if not death". The best way our lives, prior to Christ's involvement in them -- the best way they could be summed up would be to say that they were death.

The second was the last verse, 2Cl 1.8: "For he called us when we did not exist and he willed us out of non-being to be." Wow! And the clause previous to it: "We had not an ounce of hope of becoming saved if not through him." The one who created us, who called us out of non-being into being, he is the only one that can save us.

This morning, with 2Cl 1.6 still in mind, I worked through the first chapter in the Greek again, this time to work on a translation. It still needs work, but I thought I'd post it below. If you've never read Second Clement, give it a chance. If you have read it ... well, you already know it's pretty cool. Go read it again.

¹ Brethren, it is necessary for us to think in this way concerning Jesus Christ: [to think] as concerning God, [to think] as concerning the judge of the living and the dead. It is not proper for us to think little concerning our salvation. ² For when we think little concerning him, we also hope to receive little. The ones listening as though these were little things, they sin, and we sin — not knowing from where and on behalf of whom and into which place we have been called; nor how great the suffering Jesus Christ endured for us. ³ Therefore what can we give to him as return? What fruit [can we give him] worthy of that which he has given to us? And how much holiness do we owe him? ⁴ For he gave us the light; he greeted us as a Father does his sons; he saved us when we were being destroyed. ⁵ Therefore what praise shall we give to him? What wages can we give him as return? ⁶ We were maimed in our understanding, worshiping stone and wood and gold and silver and copper, the works of men. Our entire life was nothing if not death. And so we were blanketed in darkness and had eyes full of foggy mist. But we received sight, by his will we have cast off the cloud that enveloped us. ⁷ For he had mercy on us and saved us in his compassion, having seen in us the great error and destruction. We had not an ounce of hope of becoming saved, if not through him. ⁸ For he called us when we did not exist and he willed us out of non-being to be.

If you're a reader, you'll appreciate one of Scot McKnight's latest posts (how does the man write so much?!), On Marking Books. Here's a heavily ellipsed quote:

Eighth, if you don’t like a book don’t read it. ... If you find a book boring, find one that isn’t boring. And that will limit the writers you read, which is a good thing. Unfortunately, it will lead you to cut back on some influential biblical scholars who have the capacity to write mind-numbing prose backed up with buckets of references and footnotes that show off everything they’ve read and don’t advance the argument — except to show that they’ve read the stuff.

Some ricoblog readers may be interested in this post I wrote for the Logos Bible Software Blog.

It is a decent example of some of the benefits of searching the Greek New Testament by taking syntactic criteria (clauses, phrases, and relationships between words, phrases and clause components; along with morphological criteria, proximity and agreement) into account in comparison with similar searching that only takes morphological criteria (parsing/declension and lexical forms) along with proximity and agreement into account.

Phew. That's a lot of fancy words. Just read the post and you'll see what I mean.