Tuesday, October 19, 2004

Hypotyposes is on a roll.

Today they posted a link to photos of the Gospel of Peter in Greek.

Perhaps of more interest is the site itself, the Photographic Archive of Papyri in the Cairo Museum, though I'm having big-time navigation problems (both IE & FireFox) using the drop-down box. 

 | 
Post Author: Rico
Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:15:05 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 

#     |  Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]
 Monday, October 18, 2004

Thanks to Hypotyposes for the pointer.

Codex W, a fifth century MS (so, 400's) is one that is important for textual critics to have access to. Thanks to Beloit College, who placed scans (photos?) of Facsimile of the Washington Manuscript of The Four Gospels in the Freer Collection, the book of Mark from W is now online.

The images are of superb size and quality. The uncials are readable with some work. This should be very helpful for those interested in such things.

Also note that Codex W apparently has the longer ending of Mark.

Post Author: Rico
Monday, October 18, 2004 2:57:13 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 

#     |  Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]
 Sunday, October 17, 2004

It's October, so that means one thing: squash are cheap and plentiful.

So, it's soup time. I'm not a big fan of squash by itself, but I've found that I like squash in soup. So I made some soup today. I had some for dinner and it's decent, though I think it'll get better with age. The ginger (I used a lot of ginger) adds a nice flavor. I'm planning on serving it when some friends come over for a study on Tuesday.

First, you need to know a little about how I cook. I don't typically measure things, unless I'm really uncertain about a recipe. I will check out a few different recipes of the same dish just to get an idea of what needs to be done. So the instructions will be a little vague, but c'est la vie.

Rico's Squash-Ginger-Mango Soup of Power

Ingredients

2 squash. I used acorn squash, but I'm guessing anything — even pumpkin! — will do.
3 mangoes.
1 hunk o' ginger root. Mine was rather large. I like ginger.
2 cans coconut milk (or coconut cream).
Vegetable or Chicken stock (4 cups?)
Random spices. I think I used salt, curry powder, turmeric. I know there was something else, but can't quite remember what.
1/2 to 3/4 stick of butter. Not margerine, but butter.
Brown sugar (2 tbsp? it's optional)

Process

Steam the squash. You can cook it as per normal in the microwave. Or if you're a lazy bum like me and have a broken microwave that you've yet to replace, you can heat the oven up to 375. Cut the squash in half, clean out the squash guts, poke the outsides all over with a fork and put them on a lightly greased cookie sheet, cut side down. Cover with tinfoil. You want to steam 'em so make sure there aren't any gaps in the tinfoil; you're essentially building a tent to steam the squash in. Stick 'em in for 45 minutes to an hour. Bigger squash = more time. I took my two acorn squash out at 45 minutes, which seems about right for ripe acorn squash.

While the squash are getting oh-so-yummy, take the time to chop up the mangoes into square chunks (no peel). Chop the ginger as well (no peel).

Take the squash out of the oven when they're done. Let them cool somewhat (not all the way). Like, say, 5-10 minutes. Then grab a spoon and clean out the squashy goodness into a bowl of some sort. Throw the squash, mango, and ginger remnants (skin, seed/pit, etc.) on your compost pile.*

Go get your Dutch oven. This is required; if you're not makin' soup with cast iron, you've got a screw loose (unless you're going the crock-pot all-day method, which is not appropriate for this soup).

Got the Dutch oven? Good. Get the burner hot, throw the butter in there and let it start to melt. Throw in less than half of your ginger. Oh, I also threw in some brown sugar here. And, come to think of it, it might have been nice to throw in some chopped onions too. Anyway, stir it up so that the butter and sugar combine and the ginger begins to get soft. If you do go with onions, let it go for, say, 5 minutes or so to saute the onions and get 'em soft and translucent.

Add your squash. Add some chicken stock. Add your mango. Add the rest of your ginger. Pour in enough stock so that things are covered; you want to cook the mangoes down and also get the squash cooked down a bit more. Add spices here — whatever you want, however much feels good. Get it boiling, then slip it down to medium or so to simmer. Stir frequently. If it looks like it may be too thick, add more stock. Remember, though, you're adding coconut milk later. If you think you put in too much stock ... well, find something else in the fridge to throw in. It's all good.

After a while (sorry, no real time frame ... 20 minutes?) head to the blender. You're gonna puree the mixture in small batches, then return the mixture to the Dutch oven.

Once puree'd and back in the Dutch oven, it's time to add the coconut milk. So open the cans and dump away, then stir up the mixture. You want to bring it to a boil again. Then set the temperature to somewhere between medium and medium low. Add some more spices. Curry powder is good, as is salt (this will be bland unless you salt it). If you have some ground peri-peri that could add some kick. Whatever else is handy or seems good, just throw it in. If you're concerned about the color, you could add some turmeric to get it to a brighter shade of yellow. Ok, done? Great. Simmer it for awhile (30 minutes? 45 minutes? I dunno).

And you've got soup! It should be good to eat right away, but I find stuff like this gets better after a few days in the fridge. Warm it up on the stove and serve hot. Enjoy!


* compost pile: When I was growing up, we lived out in the county on 10 acres with some woods around the house. Anytime we had fruit/vegetable remnants, my brother and I had to dispose of these in the “compost pile”. This involved walking out the back door to the woods, and throwing whatever it was as far as possible. It was fun to huck rotten tomatoes deep into the woods, though it requires a certain technique. I don't have this luxury now, and I miss it. But I do have a compost pile.

Post Author: Rico
Monday, October 18, 2004 5:06:26 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 

#     |  Disclaimer  |  Comments [1]

Awhile back, I posted an offer for Google email account invitations.

In the past week or so, site logs indicate a whole lot of traffic (ok, like five hits a day, but that's a lot for me!) being directed to ricoblog as the result of a google search for account invitations. And folks I wouldn't know from Adam have been sending me requests for invitations.

So, for the record: I'm not giving out any more Google email invitations unless I know you personally.

I've deleted the comments on the earlier post so others don't get hit up. Heck, the post itself is a throwaway so I deleted the whole stinkin' post. Hopefully that addresses the issue.

Thanks to the folks who keep on readin'. Hopefully you continue to find it worthwhile.

 

Post Author: Rico
Sunday, October 17, 2004 8:03:25 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 

#     |  Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]
 Friday, October 15, 2004

Interesting entry from the Technology Liberation Front. Bottom line: Intel isn't going to break 4GHz.

I'm not a hardware geek, but even to my un-hardware-geekiness outlook, this seems like a somewhat significant development.

Post Author: Rico
Friday, October 15, 2004 3:56:02 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 

#     |  Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]
 Wednesday, October 13, 2004

Are you ready for today's dose of Daniel Berkeley Updike? This anecdote is from page 69 of the collection of his essays, The Well-Made Book: Essays & Lectures.

A certain emperor once visited the piazza of St. Peter's to see its celebrated fountains: after a few moments, supposing them to be playing in his honour, he observed that the water could now be turned off. The reply was that the order could not be obeyed, for the force that propelled the water was solely gravitational, its supply unlimited. This would perhaps have occurred to a plumber, but it did not occur to the potentate. Both were interested for different reasons, but the emperor had but one source of enjoyment — visual, while the workman had two — visual and intellectual; so the latter had the best of it!

Berkeley precedes this story with the following, describing the fountain's waterworks:

To the cultivated amateur the interest lies in what they do; to the engineer or workman the interest also lies in how they do it.

I'm still mulling over this whole motivation/compulsion thing I mentioned a few days ago. It seems to me that the ability to appreciate something (not necessarily art or architecture) on multiple levels could be a clue to one's motivation/compulsion. I find this to be true with myself. I want to understand more about all levels of topics that interest me; not simply appreciate them from a particular viewpoint. That's why I'm working through the Pastoral Epistles on a slow, methodical basis. You get the gist by just reading them, but you can't really say you understand them until you sit down and work through them on multiple levels. This is true of any sort of study of God's word. I guess I'm saying I appreciate this on multiple levels, and that may in turn feed my compulsion to understand them better.

And it's true in my job as well. I don't just want to cargo-cult code to make things work; I want to understand code so that my skill can grow and I can apply things I understand in different areas.

So, I'll ask again. What compels you? What sorts of things to you appreciate on multiple levels? What sorts of things do you have a desire to understand to a degree beyond that of average folks?

Post Author: Rico
Wednesday, October 13, 2004 4:37:19 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 

#     |  Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]
 Tuesday, October 12, 2004

As I've blogged about earlier, I'm reading a fine collection of essays from Daniel Berkeley Updike. Today's essay was “Gutenberg and His Relation to Printers Today”.

Berkeley describes the process of development on the classic 42-line Gutenberg Bible:

Like work undertaken by an experimenter who loved to perfect details as he went along, the book did not progress, or progressed so slowly that Fust [the edition's financer] began to wonder if he would ever get back the money sunk in the scheme. After various quarrels, Gutenberg was made to turn over the types in the printing-office to one of its workers — Peter Schoeffer. It was under his direction that the Bible was finished in the winter of 1455-1456, though by that time the printing office had passed out of Gutenberg's hands. (Updike, 67)

So, the bottom line: the classic 42-line Gutenberg Bible wasn't finished by Gutenberg, and may not reflect his tastes, preferences, and whatnot. However, Updike continues:

He [Gutenberg] still went on with his work and designed another, smaller and less attractive but more workable type. This was employed in the Catholicon of 1460 — a sort of dictionary — and the only book we can safely consider as wholly the work of Gutenberg. (Updike, 67)

So, most folks have mental images of the 42-line Gutenberg Bible type in their heads, and have it positively associated with Gutenberg and his press. But it wasn't Gutenberg's final product.

The internet is very cool, and with a few clicks of some keys and a trip to the Google home page, I located some high-quality scans of Gutenberg's 1460 Catholicon. So hop on over and take a look. If your German is rusty (or non-existent, like mine) the links on the middle left of the page go to images detailing a few pages of the work.

The type is smaller, but (to my humble eyes) seems more readable.

Post Author: Rico
Tuesday, October 12, 2004 5:17:12 PM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 

#     |  Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]
 Monday, October 11, 2004

Well, it's official. The good folks at Logos are, for some reason, cartin' me along to the ETS and SBL meetings in San Antonio in November. Yay!

I've never been to an ETS or SBL meeting. I've wanted to go to the annual SBL meeting for a few years now; it seems like there is always lots of interesting stuff going on there. I'll surely pull booth duty for a decent share of the conferences, but this brings me to my question.

I'm guessing that the few folks that do read this blog (those outside of Logos, anyway) have some familiarity with the ETS and SBL conferences. So take a look at the category listing on the right side of the page. That's the kind of stuff I'm interested in — particularly textual criticism, apostolic fathers, and the pastoral epistles; not to mention Greek (grammars, lexicography, etc.) and early versions of the New Testament. I'm not too familiar with Coptic/Armenian/Ethiopic/etc., but I just generally think such things are cool. Of course, sessions on the use of computers in Biblical study are of primary interest.

Do you have any sessions, papers, or whatnot you'd recommend that I attend? I'm looking at building a list of sessions to potentially attend so that, in the event of free time, I'll have an idea where to go without having to stop and consult the program — I'll just head to the spot on my list for that timeframe. Drop me an email or drop a comment on this thread with some pointers for me. (Please don't just point me to the program book; I'm looking for folks recommending specific sessions. Thanks.)

Also, if you're going to be at ETS or SBL and would like to meet for some reason, drop me a line. The email is textgeek@gmail.com. Apart from booth duty (and I'm unsure what that obligation will be) my schedule is fairly much wide open. So if you want to talk about any of the above subjects, or Bible software, or whatever ... let me know; and please suggest a day and time to meet. I'd love to talk with you further.

Thanks!

Post Author: Rico
Tuesday, October 12, 2004 6:11:52 AM (Pacific Daylight Time, UTC-07:00) 

#     |  Disclaimer  |  Comments [0]